Warning: in_array() expects parameter 2 to be array, string given in /home/a24695412/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-mobile-pack/frontend/sections/show-rel.php on line 49

Warning: array_intersect(): Argument #2 is not an array in /home/a24695412/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-mobile-pack/frontend/sections/show-rel.php on line 54
Home // MR2, 4A-GE, 7A-GE Tech // Balancing the 7A-GE

Balancing the 7A-GE

To shop for parts: Click the tab marked SHOP near the top of any page to visit SV3Power.com/store/.

Someone asked about balancing the assembly.  Here’s what I did.

First, you can always have the assembly balanced professionally.  I was quoted about $90US for a four-cylinder.

I figured that since none of the connecting rods had any sort of machine work on them, Toyota was not balancing the rods by themselves.  With this in mind I figured they must know pretty much what a 7A-FE rod weighs and those weights must be fairly consistent.  The crank, on the other hand, had a whole lot of holes drilled in the counterweights.  Some of these holes are quite small, indicating a high degree of precision.  It looks as though Toyota simply balances each crank and then chooses rods and pistons with weights reasonably close to each other.

Assuming the crank was already pretty perfectly balanced, I figured I could safely balance the pistons and rods myself and end up with a pretty smooth-running engine.  I bought a digital kitchen scale accurate to one gram and weighed each piston.  I then weighed each pin and each connecting rod.  By setting the small end of the rod on a fulcrum and the big end on the scale, I got repeatable, consistent weights for the big end of each rod.  Subtracting the weight of the big end from the whole rod’s mass gave me the small end weight.  These figures probably don’t exactly represent the weight of the big end and small end, but they are repeatable and give a good idea of the relative difference between them all, which is what we are most concerned with.  Pretty simple so far:


Piston & Pin Pistin, Pin, Sm. End Piston, Pin, Rod Big End – Cut Amount Result (Big End, Combo)
1 416 463 920 1g 456, 919
2 416 462 919 0 457, 919
3 417 463 919 0 456, 919
4 418 463 921 2g 456, 919


What it all means is that by matching the heaviest pistons with the lightest pins, that combo was as evenly matched as could be – within a two-gram spread.  By matching the heaviest piston-pin package with the lightest little end, that combo was as evenly matched as it could be as well – less than one gram between them.  Conveniently, the rods were consistent enough that total weight was very close (within two grams), and it worked out that by trimming a little bit from only two end caps, the big end weights all balanced to within one gram of each other, and most amazing to me, the entire assembly (piston, pin, and rod) balanced to within one gram total weight.  This was confirmed on the scale before I assembled the engine.

This was all speculation and, in hindsight, I wouldn’t try this again without confirming that the crankshaft had zero imbalance. At any rate, the engine is smooth all the way to (and sometimes through) redline.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *